Abstract
Frequency domain impedance measurements are still the common approach in assessing passive electrical properties of cells and tissues. However, due to the time requirements for sweeping over a frequency range for performing spectroscopy, they are not suited for recovering fast impedance changes of biological objects. The use of broad bandwidth excitation and monitoring the response as a function of time will greatly reduce the measurement time. The widespread usage of a square wave excitation is simple but not always the best choice. Here we consider different waveforms for excitation and discuss not only the advantages but also their limitations. Measurements in a miniaturized chamber where frequency and time domain measurements are compared show the suitability of different waveforms as excitation signals for the measurements of bio-impedance. The chirp excitation has been found to be most promising in terms of frequency range, signal-to-noise ratio and crest factor.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
