Abstract

Approaches to social network heterogeneity in political communication research tend to focus on the effect of accumulated interactions among individuals with different political views. This line of research has provided a number of rich insights into the nature of the relationship between sociality and political participation. At the same time, this research tradition has been hampered by inconsistent terminology, and it has not been updated to reflect the fact that the experience of engaging with politics through digital media produces a unique subjective experience wherein the user is made to address an imagined audience with a perceived set of characteristics. In this study I aim to accomplish three main objectives. First, I propose an adjustment to the conceptual framework used in the literature. Second, I introduce the concept of subjective social network heterogeneity to describe perceived heterogeneity in the political views of the imagined audience. Third, I investigate the relationship between subjective social network heterogeneity and political expression empirically, through an analysis of original survey data from Japan and South Korea. The results show that differences between the political views of an individual and the perceived political views of the imagined audience depresses political expression on social media in both countries, but that variance in the perceived views of the imagined audience is positively associated with political expression.

Highlights

  • Many theories of democracy posit that the interaction of politically diverse individuals is fundamental to maintaining or producing democracy

  • The results of the analysis suggest that perceived political difference between individuals and the imagined audience is negatively associated with political expression in both countries, but that perceived diversity in the political views of the imagined audience is positively associated with political expression, though the results vary by country

  • Turning to RQ1, the results of the analysis show that SND is positively associated with the frequency of the endorsing of political content on social media

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many theories of democracy posit that the interaction of politically diverse individuals is fundamental to maintaining or producing democracy. Thought of as an essential aspect of a healthy democratic culture because it is related to norms of tolerance (Almond & Verba, 1963) This recognition of the importance of interaction among politically diverse individuals and populations— referred to as “cross-pressures” or “social network heterogeneity”—has motivated a long line of social scientific research. Our conceptual framework for understanding this relationship remains rooted in the pre-digital era, based as it is on traditional notions of social groups, the accumulated influence of social interactions, and traditional forms of political participation While this framework is still useful, it is important to recognize that individuals today are enmeshed in global digitally-mediated networks that individuals in the 1940s were not. Many people interact with politics, political information, and each other almost entirely through digital media and social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call