Abstract

ABSTRACT Social and cultural anthropology is a descriptive, theorising and comparative social science. It has a holistic orientation, i.e. it directs its gaze to complex interrelationships between different subfields of cultural dynamics. However, this understanding is not a stand-alone feature of the anthropological approach, but is also valid for the intersectionality framework. This article seeks to explore the relationship between both approaches, as they both capture entangled identifications, power structures and social dynamics, yet, from different angles. It, furthermore, carves out the benefit of bringing both approaches into dialogue: Intersectionality makes sense of holistic intersections in a way that carries hierarchical relationships to the core of research. By contrast, the anthropological angle gives special meaning to mutually constitutive identity formations and their related power systems through thick ethnographic data. By conflating the two, I suggest a heuristic framework in this article – Scaling Holistic Intersectionality – for doing ethnography with a power-critical perspective in a transnational and globalised world.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.