Abstract
Spectral reconstruction from RGB or spectral super-resolution (SSR) offers a cheap alternative to otherwise costly and more complex spectral imaging devices. In recent years, deep learning based methods consistently achieved the best reconstruction quality in terms of spectral error metrics. However, there are important properties that are not maintained by deep neural networks. This work is primarily dedicated to scale invariance, also known as brightness invariance or exposure invariance. When RGB signals only differ in their absolute scale, they should lead to identical spectral reconstructions apart from the scaling factor. Scale invariance is an essential property that signal processing must guarantee for a wide range of practical applications. At the moment, scale invariance can only be achieved by relying on a diverse database during network training that covers all possibly occurring signal intensities. In contrast, we propose and evaluate a fundamental approach for deep learning based SSR that holds the property of scale invariance by design and is independent of the training data. The approach is independent of concrete network architectures and instead focuses on reevaluating what neural networks should actually predict. The key insight is that signal magnitudes are irrelevant for acquiring spectral reconstructions from camera signals and are only useful for a potential signal denoising.
Highlights
Spectral imaging itself offers benefits for a variety of applications throughout computer vision.All applications that can profit from spectral imaging belong on an abstract level to one of the areas of color science or remote sensing
We considered the fully stacked configuration consisting of the basic adaptive weight attention network (AWAN) network combined with the patch-level second-order non-local (PSNL) and the adaptive weighted channel attention (AWCA) modules as reported in [15]
This is due to the increased amount of disturbances introduced in the RGB image creation
Summary
All applications that can profit from spectral imaging belong on an abstract level to one of the areas of color science or remote sensing. The terms spectral, multi-spectral and hyper-spectral are broadly utilized and are not well defined. There exist multiple and distinct definitions for the same terms depending on the current field, e.g., remote sensing or colorimetry. The major commonality is that spectral imaging is a generic term for both multi-spectral and hyper-spectral imaging. Hyper-spectral imaging makes it possible to measure the continuous spectrum. Multi-spectral imaging only allows to sample the spectrum at a higher resolution, since it utilizes more channels than RGB devices have. The greatest ambiguity lies in the view of what is a sufficient representation of a continuous spectrum
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.