Abstract
This briefing provides an outline comparative study of institutional arbitration rules published since the UNCITRAL Model Law, from the perspective of a practising expert witness. The article compares and contrasts procedures published in civil and common law jurisdictions and their alternative emphases on tribunal appointees and party appointed experts. It also highlights examples of different rules, identifying typical provisions and highlighting any unusual aspects. The regional rules considered in the article will be the current editions of AAA, ACICA, ADCCAC, CIArb, DIAC, HKIAC, ICC, ICE, ICSIC, LCIA, LMAA, SIAC, SCC and UNCITRAL. In addition, the IBA and CIArb rules, as evidential overlays to these regional rules are also considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
