Brief Web-Based Intervention for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial on Behavioral Activation.

Lena Jelinek,Steffen Moritz,Sönke Arlt,Stefan Westermann,Barbara Cludius,Johanna Schröder

doi:10.2196/15312

Abstract

BackgroundWeb-based interventions have been shown to be effective for the treatment of depression. However, interventions are often complex and include a variety of elements, making it difficult to identify the most effective component(s).ObjectiveThe aim of this pilot study was to shed light on mechanisms in the online treatment of depression by comparing a single-module, fully automated intervention for depression (internet-based behavioral activation [iBA]) to a nonoverlapping active control intervention and a nonactive control group.MethodsWe assessed 104 people with at least mild depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, >4) via the internet at baseline (t0) and 2 weeks (t1) and 4 weeks (t2) later. After the t0 assessment, participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) iBA (n=37), (2) active control using a brief internet-based mindfulness intervention (iMBI, n=32), or (3) care as usual (CAU, n=35). The primary outcome was improvement in depressive symptoms, as measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Secondary parameters included changes in activity, dysfunctional attitudes, and quality of lifeResultsWhile groups did not differ regarding the change in depression from t0 to t1 (ηp2=.007, P=.746) or t0 to t2 (ηp2=.008, P=.735), iBA was associated with a larger decrease in dysfunctional attitudes from t0 to t2 in comparison to CAU (ηp2=.053, P=.04) and a larger increase in activity from t0 to t1 than the pooled control groups (ηp2=.060, P=.02). A change in depression from t0 to t2 was mediated by a change in activity from t0 to t1. At t1, 22% (6/27) of the participants in the iBA group and 12% (3/25) of the participants in the iMBI group indicated that they did not use the intervention.ConclusionsAlthough we did not find support for the short-term efficacy of the single-module iBA regarding depression, long-term effects are still conceivable, potentially initiated by changes in secondary outcomes. Future studies should use a longer intervention and follow-up interval.Trial RegistrationDKRS (#DRKS00011562)

Highlights

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling disorder that affects millions of people worldwide
We investigated a brief internet-delivered BA (iBA) module compared with an active control in the form of internet-delivered mindfulness and a nonactive control in the form of a waitlist with full access to care as usual (CAU)
Previous studies have shown an effect of unguided interventions on depression [9], the results of our study and that by Lüdtke et al may indicate that iBA cannot be learned without therapist contact or that a single-module approach is insufficient to cause change in proximal measures

Summary

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling disorder that affects millions of people worldwide. POIs for depression vary substantially with regard to content; level of guidance/support (guided, unguided, or self-guided [8,9]); duration, with most interventions lasting between 4 and 12 weeks [5]; the degree to which patients can tailor or self-select specific intervention components; and the degree to which interventions focus on a single stand-alone technique or incorporate multiple therapeutic techniques (eg, cognitive behavioral-based interventions for depression usually include psychoeducation, behavior monitoring, cognitive restructuring, and behavioral activation) These differences make it difficult to investigate the mechanisms of change and identify which techniques are the most important for change, as demonstrated for depression [10].

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion