Abstract

Our ability to integrate multiple sensory-based representations of our surrounding supplies us with a more holistic view of our world. There are many complex algorithms our nervous system uses to construct a coherent perception. An indicator to solve this ‘binding problem’ are the temporal characteristics with the specificity that environmental information has different propagation speeds (e.g., sound and electromagnetic waves) and sensory processing time and thus the temporal relationship of a stimulus pair derived from the same event must be flexibly adjusted by our brain. This tolerance can be conceptualized in the form of the cross-modal temporal binding window (TBW). Several studies showed the plasticity of the TBW and its importance concerning audio-visual illusions, synesthesia, as well as psychiatric disturbances. Using three audio-visual paradigms, we investigated the importance of length (short vs. long) as well as modality (uni- vs. multimodal) of a perceptual training aiming at reducing the TBW in a healthy population. We also investigated the influence of the TBW on speech intelligibility, where participants had to integrate auditory and visual speech information from a videotaped speaker. We showed that simple sensory trainings can change the TBW and are capable of optimizing speech perception at a very naturalistic level. While the training-length had no different effect on the malleability of the TBW, the multisensory trainings induced a significantly stronger narrowing of the TBW than their unisensory counterparts. Furthermore, a narrowing of the TBW was associated with a better performance in speech perception, meaning that participants showed a greater capacity for integrating informations from different sensory modalities in situations with one modality impaired. All effects persisted at least seven days. Our findings show the significance of multisensory temporal processing regarding ecologically valid measures and have important clinical implications for interventions that may be used to alleviate debilitating conditions (e.g., autism, schizophrenia), in which multisensory temporal function is shown to be impaired.

Highlights

  • As Sumby and Pollack (1954) showed more than half a century ago, especially in situations with low signal-to-noise ratios, we utilize visual factors, such as the speakers’ lips and facial movements, to maximize our speech intelligibility

  • The temporal characteristics are of important value with the specificity that environmental information has different propagation speeds and sensory processing time and the temporal relationship of a stimulus pair derived from the same event must be adjusted by our multisensory system (Meredith et al, 1987)

  • Several one-way ANOVAs were computed showing no significant differences at the first point of measurement for all of the 11 simultaneity judgement task (SJT), 10 Double Flash Illusion Task (DFIT)- und 4 Word Recognition Task (WRT)-Conditions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

As Sumby and Pollack (1954) showed more than half a century ago, especially in situations with low signal-to-noise ratios, we utilize visual factors, such as the speakers’ lips and facial movements, to maximize our speech intelligibility This use of concurrent sensory information from different modalities is plausible on the level of perception and agrees with our everyday experience. The temporal characteristics are of important value with the specificity that environmental information has different propagation speeds (e.g., sound and electromagnetic waves) and sensory processing time and the temporal relationship of a stimulus pair derived from the same event must be adjusted by our multisensory system (Meredith et al, 1987) This tolerance for temporal cooccurrence of stimuli from different sensory modalities can be conceptualized in the form of the multimodal temporal binding window (TBW). We assumed that a narrowing of the TBW should have a positive effect on speech intelligibility - more precisely in situations with low signal-to-noise ratios, where you would expect people to benefit from seeing the speakers’ lips and facial movements

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Participants
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call