Abstract
The extra-cellular cochlear microphonic is believed to be generated predominantly by outer hair cells and therefore it would seem reasonable to assume that the presence of a cochlear microphonic excludes outer hair cell dysfunction. Indeed, a diagnosis of auditory neuropathy might be, and has been, made on the basis of a cochlear microphonic present with an abnormal auditory brainstem response. Animal studies, however, have shown that the cochlear microphonic recorded from the round window is dominated by cellular generators located in the base of the cochlea. Primarily on this basis, it is argued that the presence of a cochlear microphonic does not exclude outer hair cell pathology and so outer hair cell integrity should not necessarily be inferred from the presence of the cochlear microphonic alone. In contrast, the absence of an otoacoustic emission in such cases is consistent with outer hair cell dysfunction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.