Abstract

The benefits of rapidly up-titrating evidence-based treatments following heart failure (HF) hospitalizations were demonstrated in the STRONG-HF trial and emphasized in contemporary HF guideline. We aimed to assess up-titration patterns of guideline-directed medical treatments in Taiwanese HF population. Combining data from the TSOC-HFrEF registry and the TAROT-AHF study cohort, we formed the “Taiwan real-world cohort”. We compared these data with subgroups of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients in the Taiwan exhibited similar blood pressure, heart rate and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels at discharge compared to those in the STRONG-HF trial. A higher proportion of patients in the STRONG-HF high-intensity care group received up-titrations compared to those in the usual care group and the Taiwan cohort. Composite all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 180 days for patients in the high-intensity care group, usual care group, and Taiwan cohort were 17.4%, 23.7%, and 31.9%, respectively, with differences largely contributed by HF hospitalization (10.1%, 17.9%, and 27.6%, respectively), while all-cause mortality rates were similar (11.0%, 9.6%, and 9.3%, respectively). Gender did not affect this trend. In conclusion, our data highlights a treatment gap between the STRONG-HF trial and real-world practices in Taiwan, urging prompt optimization of HF therapy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call