Bridging the gap between public expectations and public willingness to pay.

Abstract

Health EconomicsVolume 6, Issue 1 p. 1-9 Guest EditorialFree Access Bridging the Gap Between Public Expectations and Public Willingness to Pay Clive H. Smee, Corresponding Author Clive H. Smee Visiting Professor, Department of Economics, University of Surrey and Chief Economic Adviser, Department of Health, London, UKC. H. Smee, Department of Health, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London SE1 6LW, UK.===Search for more papers by this author Clive H. Smee, Corresponding Author Clive H. Smee Visiting Professor, Department of Economics, University of Surrey and Chief Economic Adviser, Department of Health, London, UKC. H. Smee, Department of Health, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London SE1 6LW, UK.===Search for more papers by this author First published: 04 December 1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199701)6:1<1::AID-HEC240>3.0.CO;2-OCitations: 6AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 OECD Health Data, 1996. The normal cautions apply to all these international comparisons. 2 Policy and Consultation Branch, Health Canada. National Health Expenditures in Canada. 1975-1994 Canada: Minister of Supply and Services, 1996. 3 Drug Utilization Sub-Committee of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Prescription drug utilization following change in the level of patient co-payment in Australia. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety in press. 4 Center for Corporate Health Inc. A Survey of Health Promotion and Patient Education Programs Offered by HMO, January 1995. Reported in Medical Benefits 15 February 1995. 5 Liberal and National Parties Policy Statement. A Healthy Future. 12 February 1996. 6 Health Solutions. Independent Assessment of Casemix Payment in Victoria. A Report to the Casemix Development Program of the Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health. Melbourne: Health Solutions, 1994. 7 National Health Ministers' Benchmarking Working Group. First National Report on Health Sector Performance Indicators: Public Hospitals – the State of Play. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1996. 8 Lomas, J. Devolved authorities in Canada: the new site of health-care system conflict. In: J. L. Dorland and S. M. Davis (Eds) How Many Roads? Regionalization and Decentralization in Health Care. Queens University School of Policy Studies, 1996. 9 Robinson, J. C. and Casalino, C. P. Vertical integration and organizational networks in health care. Health Affairs 1996: 15: 7– 22. 10 CBO Memorandum. The Effect of Managed Care and Managed Competition. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office, February 1995. 11 National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services. Fourth Annual Report. Wellington: National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services, September 1995. 12 Maynard, A. International Experience with Decentralization and Regionalization - United Kingdom. In: J. L. Dorland and S. M. Davis (Eds) How Many Roads? Regionalization and Decentralization in Health Care. Queens University School of Policy Studies, 1996. 13 Fuchs, V. R. Economics, values and health care reform. The American Economic Review 1996: 86: 1– 24. Citing Literature Volume6, Issue1January 1997Pages 1-9 ReferencesRelatedInformation