Abstract
This article explores tensions inherent in representations of the angel in some late medieval texts using Irigaray’s concept of an ‘ethics of alterity’. I contend that the angel has a dual valency, witnessed at the site of the body. It is simultaneously a masculine construct, a tangible index of holy worth associated with the ocular and a feminised, ambiguous symbol allied to scent, sound and touch, thus highlighting and eliding sexual difference. The angel, then, is not simply a messenger but a bridge between humans and God, between men and women, one that affirms the mutuality of a loving relationship. I have an aungel which that loveth me That with greet love, wher so I wake or sleepe, Is redy ay my body for to kepe. [VIII(G), 152^4]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
