Abstract

This study empirically investigates the influence of bridging organizations on governance outcomes for marine conservation in Indonesia. Conservation challenges require ways of governing that are collaborative and adaptive across boundaries, and where conservation actions are better coordinated, information flows improved, and knowledge better integrated and mobilized. We combine quantitative social network analysis and qualitative data to analyze bridging organizations and their networks, and to understand their contributions and constraints in two case studies in Bali, Indonesia. The analysis shows 1) bridging organizations help to navigate the ‘messiness’ inherent in conservation settings by compensating for sparse linkages, 2) the particular structure and function of bridging organizations influence governing processes (i.e., collaboration, knowledge sharing) and subsequent conservation outcomes, 3) ‘bridging’ is accomplished using different strategies and platforms for collaboration and social learning, and 4) bridging organizations enhance flexibility to adjust to changing marine conservation contexts and needs. Understanding the organizations that occupy bridging positions, and how they utilize their positionality in a governance network is emerging as an important determinant of successful conservation outcomes. Our findings contribute to a relatively new body of literature on bridging organizations in marine conservation contexts, and add needed empirical investigation into their value to governance and conservation in Coral Triangle nations and beyond.

Highlights

  • A major challenge to effective conservation outcomes in the southeast Asia Coral Triangle (CT) is the ‘messiness’ of contemporary marine governance

  • The aim of this paper is to empirically investigate how bridging organizations contribute to better conservation outcomes by affecting key processes for adaptive marine governance in the CT context

  • We synthesize the outcomes of the social network analysis (SNA) to map and characterize the network in each case and to identify bridging organizations using measures of centrality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A major challenge to effective conservation outcomes in the southeast Asia Coral Triangle (CT) is the ‘messiness’ of contemporary marine governance. People and groups bring different values, interests, perspectives, knowledge and power to conservation situations that span geographical and jurisdictional scales and levels (e.g., [1,2,3,4,5]). In Indonesia, decentralized governance and limited technical and financial capacity [4,6] further complicate definitions of PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0147142. Canada Partnership Grant for the Community Conservation Research Network The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.