Abstract
Two reconstruction plate systems, the 3-dimensionally-bendable reconstruction plate (3-DBRP) and the titanium hollow screw and reconstruction plate (THORP) were compared in clinical use. Fewer complications in patients were observed with the THORP system than with the 3-DBRP system. In general, both systems are reliable and approved. In cases of extensive defects, however, the THORP system appears to be more effective because of its larger size and its better anchorage.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
