Abstract

Whole-brain network analysis is commonly used to investigate the topology of the brain using a variety of neuroimaging modalities. This approach is notable for its applicability to a large number of domains, such as understanding how brain network organization relates to cognition and behavior and examining disrupted brain network organization in disease. A benefit to this approach is the ability to summarize overall brain network organization with a single metric (e.g., global efficiency). However, important local differences in network structure might exist without any corresponding observable differences in global topology, making a whole-brain analysis strategy unlikely to detect relevant local findings. Conversely, using local network metrics can identify local differences, but are not directly informative of differences in global topology. Here, we propose the network statistic (NS) jackknife framework, a simulated lesioning method that combines the utility of global network analysis strategies with the ability to detect relevant local differences in network structure. We evaluate the NS jackknife framework with a simulation study and an empirical example comparing global efficiency in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and typically developing (TD) children. The NS jackknife framework has been implemented in a public, open-source R package, netjack, available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=netjack.

Highlights

  • Describing the brain as a network, an approach termed network neuroscience (Bassett & Sporns, 2017), is a powerful method that allows regions distributed across the entire brain to be incorporated into a single model describing overall brain topology

  • We evaluate the performance of the network statistic (NS) jackknife with a simulation study and demonstrate the utility of this method with an empirical example comparing resting-state brain network organization in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and age-matched typically developing (TD) children

  • Group differences by subnetwork removal: we examined group differences in global efficiency between children with ADHD and TD children after removing each functional subnetwork

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Describing the brain as a network, an approach termed network neuroscience (Bassett & Sporns, 2017), is a powerful method that allows regions distributed across the entire brain to be incorporated into a single model describing overall brain topology. This refers to the fact that whole-brain network analysis methods operate at a global resolution, while relevant differences might be very localized. Observed global differences in topology could be driven by a specific local difference (i.e., an observed overall difference in network integration could be driven by a difference limited to a single subnetwork). This mismatch in resolution, could obscure meaningful differences in network structure.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.