Abstract
The approach to Brexit in the current political dilemma is challengeable for the seekers who want to understand the problem with clarity and perceptibility with the very nature of the European politics. It’s under process of becoming coherent and unprecedented in terms of its consequences. Although the opening and ending of the curtain of the European theatre has always been spectacular for its peoples and to the peoples of nearby continents connected to it by a vicarious cycle and in an extended perspective to the rest of the world, but this time the actors are emerging with a new play with a new set of performances. This research is tend to apply the analytical and argumentative approach for the issue in consideration to take into account the different perspectives of the problem in order to perceive and suggest the divergent possibilities involved in a particular issue not only for the EU members but also for other powers. Explained in it are the factors that at first provide impetus for integration despite the presence of the disintegrating elements at the first place, and then the consideration of emerging politics of preferences, evolved with a passage of time, and let those disintegrating forces overcome.
Highlights
The act of Brexit from European Union has evolved with time in a long period of uncertainty, tension, suppression and anxiety
‘It’s stagnating national economy after the Great Depression of 1970s with a malign combination of high inflation, unemployment, low productivity, and industrial rest’ affected its preferential choices regarding the joining of the European Union, European economic community (EEC). (Clarke, Goodwin & Whiteley, 2017: 2)
Its economic crisis was intensified with high Inflation, Unemployment and under paid employment due to the oil crisis of 1973 which deeply affected the conceptualization of a regulatory authority that can preserve the British economy by framing out a transitionary oil policy
Summary
The act of Brexit from European Union has evolved with time in a long period of uncertainty, tension, suppression and anxiety. Britain has a long history of democratic values that was a leading factor in the joining, and in the departing from the European Union Their people never tend to compromise on substandard democracy or a supranational body that confronts or restrain their control over their internal issues or regulate their economy by influencing their choices by legally binding monetary structures and oblige them to certain laws. Further elaborated in clause C; ‘The treaties shall cease to apply to the state in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the negotiation referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.’(ibid.) The United Kingdom of Britain under the premiership of the Conservative party leader David Cameron opted a referendum ‘on June 23rd, 2016, which resulted in the majority of 51.9% or 17.4 million people voted to leave the European Union with a contrasting opposition of 48.1% or 16.1 million people who voted to Remain in the union. It will bridge the gaps of economies and compromise the standards of housing, health care services, workers’ rights and infrastructures
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
