Abstract

ABSTRACT The causes of Brexit are usually analysed from the viewpoint of the domestic factors that led to the outcome of the 2016 referendum. In contrast, this article examines whether the impact of European integration on the United Kingdom’s parliamentary democracy can be used to help understand the context in which the debates about the UK’s departure from in the EU took place. Applying an interpretive sociological approach and analysing interviews with MPs in the House of Commons’ European scrutiny system and parliamentary reports, the author finds that MPs’ role conflicts have risen in three phases since 1992. Procedural adaptations have helped MPs play their deliberative role better, but they have also exposed important limitations for other traditional legitimation logics. The findings point to the need for further studies on the impact of European decision-making on domestic democratic practices, both to better understand the context of Brexit and to create more resilient democratic institutions in the EU.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.