Abstract
This paper develops a triple restriction on Thomas Aquinas and his notion of science: it´s going to refer to the confusion between Cajetan and Aquinas, and thought´s neo-Thomist of the twentieth century and a sharp divergence from the hermeneutic tradition. In the first two are the diversion of Thomistic approach to be epistemological abstraction. Of the latter, the need to recover the origin of science in the Aquiante.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.