Abstract

Identifying the processes that determine avian migratory strategies in different environmental contexts is imperative to understanding the constraints to survival and reproduction faced by migratory birds across the planet.We compared the spring migration strategies of Fork‐tailed Flycatchers (Tyrannus s. savana) that breed at south‐temperate latitudes (i.e., austral migrants) vs. tropical latitudes (i.e., intratropical migrants) in South America. We hypothesized that austral migrant flycatchers are more time‐selected than intratropical migrants during spring migration. As such, we predicted that austral migrants, which migrate further than intratropical migrants, will migrate at a faster rate and that the rate of migration for austral migrants will be positively correlated with the onset of spring migration.We attached light‐level geolocators to Fork‐tailed Flycatchers at two tropical breeding sites in Brazil and at two south‐temperate breeding sites in Argentina and tracked their movements until the following breeding season.Of 286 geolocators that were deployed, 37 were recovered ~1 year later, of which 28 provided useable data. Rate of spring migration did not differ significantly between the two groups, and only at one site was there a significantly positive relationship between date of initiation of spring migration and arrival date.This represents the first comparison of individual migratory strategies among conspecific passerines breeding at tropical vs. temperate latitudes and suggests that austral migrant Fork‐tailed Flycatchers in South America are not more time‐selected on spring migration than intratropical migrant conspecifics. Low sample sizes could have diminished our power to detect differences (e.g., between sexes), such that further research into the mechanisms underpinning migratory strategies in this poorly understood system is necessary.

Highlights

  • Bird migration across the New World is ubiquitous, from high Arctic tundra to Patagonia, and research on the mechanisms underpinning avian migratory patterns in the New World and beyond continues to be a rapidly growing area of inquiry

  • We de‐ ployed light‐level geolocators on migratory Fork‐tailed Flycatchers (Tyrannus s. savana) in South America. This subspecies breeds from central Brazil to central Argentina (Mobley, 2004), with Brazilian populations breeding at tropical latitudes and overwintering in northern South America (Jahn, Giraldo, et al, 2016; Jahn, Seavy, et al, 2016); they are intratropical migrants

  • We found little support for the hypothesis that austral migrants are more time‐selected on spring migration than intra‐ tropical migrant conspecifics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bird migration across the New World is ubiquitous, from high Arctic tundra to Patagonia, and research on the mechanisms underpinning avian migratory patterns in the New World and beyond continues to be a rapidly growing area of inquiry. Such studies have shown that the timing and pace of migration and the location of migratory routes can vary widely between species, and between populations within a species (e.g., Sylvia warblers, Fransson, 1995; Collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis, Briedis et al, 2016; Northern wheatears, Oenanthe oenanthe, Bairlein et al, 2012; Wood thrushes, Hylocichla mustelina, Stanley, MacPherson, Fraser, McKinnon, & Stutchbury, 2012; White‐crested elaenias, Elaenia albiceps, Bravo, Cueto, & Gorosito, 2017). Under optimal bird migration theory, such birds are thought to be time‐selected migrants (Åkesson & Hedenström, 2007; Alerstam & Lindström, 1990; Hedenström, 2008)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call