Abstract

FHB is one of the most destructive diseases of wheat. Resistance testing depends strongly on inoculation methods, and on measured traits. Therefore a four-year (2009-2012) study was performed using spray inoculation + polyethylene (PE) bag cover, spray inoculation + mist irrigation, and spawn method supported by mist irrigation on 40 genotypes, 20 from Hungary and 20 from IFA Tulln, Austria. Each year four isolates were used in artificial inoculations except the spawn method where stalk debris served the inoculum. Visual Fusarium head blight (FHB) scores, Fusarium damaged kernels (FDK) and deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination were checked. 7680 FHB and FDK, as well as 3840 DON analyses served as the background for the statistical evaluation. The most reliable method used was the spray + polyethylene (PE) bag; the other two were significantly poorer being valid for all traits. The FHB scores were the least reliable, whereas the FDK was much more consequent and the DON gave the best results. The FDK gave much better predictions for DON contamination than FHB. The cultivars responses correlated well at different epidemic severities. The presence of the kernel resistance was confirmed and a new trait as extra kernel susceptibility was described. Presence of DON resistance was confirmed again, and extra DON susceptibility was described as a new trait. DON performance varied on the most sensitive cultivar between 0.32 and 143 mg/kg (mean 17.52 mg/kg) and on the most resistant genotype between 0.00 and 18.19 mg/kg (mean 1.87 mg/kg). Correlations between stability and resistance level are r = 0.85 for FHB, 0.78 for FDK, and 0.88 for DON, all at a significance level of p = 0.001. The very close correlation between FDK and DON contamination (r = 0.81, p = 0.001) proves that control of DON contamination needs appropriate resistance. In the breeding program evaluation of FDK is the most important, and then DON will be decided. Variety registration must be updated; otherwise no improvement on the field will occur.

Highlights

  • Fusarium head blight (FHB) is an economically devastating disease of wheat and other small grains [1]-[4]

  • The three methods outlined in this paper have a common background. This is clear for the two spraying variants, but the spawn method belongs here as the basis of the method is that the inoculum will be delivered from inoculated maize grain or stalk residues naturally to the heads

  • It is evident that FHB resistance is race-non-specific [21] [24] [25] [33] [45] [72], selection for a highly aggressive isolate will result in a higher resistance to all Fusarium species tested until now

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is an economically devastating disease of wheat and other small grains [1]-[4]. It is generally assumed that breeding for resistance against Fusarium head blight (FHB) is the most effective method to decrease DON contamination. The practical results are, not so good as expected For this reason the problem needs a careful revision and we should clarify several aspects that we did not consider to have a serious importance. Wheat is damaged by many Fusarium spp. worldwide, but the main pathogen near everywhere is F. graminearum (Gibberella zeae) or F. culmorum. For this reason we concentrate on these species as they are responsible for the DON contamination of the cereal grains we want to lower

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call