Abstract

An excessive sympathetic drive is commonly observed in hypertensive patients and critically contributes to increasing arterial pressure levels. The quality of postnatal life can impact sympathetic control in adulthood. Spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats, an experimental model of neurogenic hypertension, exhibit breathing irregularities in adult life. In this study, we investigated whether SH rats display breathing abnormalities after birth, which could be a risk factor for developing sympathetic overactivity. Using head-out plethysmography, we found that the neonate (P0-2, male and female) SH rats (n=9) exhibited lower minute ventilation than age-matched normotensive rats (NT, n=14; 816±177 vs 1261±189 ml/min/kg, P<0.05) under resting conditions, mainly due to reductions in respiratory frequency (93±15 vs 132±13 cpm, P<0.05). The reduced baseline ventilation in the SH group was accompanied by a greater prevalence of periods of apneas and respiratory irregularities (P<0.05). Under hypoxia conditions (10% O2, 10 min), SH and NT rats (n=9/each) mounted similar transient increases in minute ventilation during the initial period of exposure due to increments in tidal volume. In contrast, the respiratory frequency in the SH rats decreased progressively below baseline levels during hypoxia exposure (42% reduction, P<0.05), while it remained similar to pre-hypoxia values in the control group. In rhythmic in vitro preparations from neonate SH rats (n=2), we identified ectopic bursts in the hypoglossal activity and prolonged inspiratory-related bursts in the preBötzinger complex compared to preparations from NT rats (n=2). Our findings indicate that breathing irregularities in SH rats are present from birth and could be linked to dysfunctions in the inspiratory rhythm-generating network. Financial support: FAPESP, CNPq. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call