Abstract

PurposeTo compare breast stiffness based on shear-wave elastography (SWE) quantitative parameters with histopathologic results diagnosed by ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) to determine their association with upgrade rates after surgical excision or follow-up US as well as clinico-radiologic differences between upgrade and non-upgrade groups. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 225 breast lesions from 225 patients, including 159 benign lesions, 38 high risk lesions and 28 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed by US-guided CNB. Quantitative SWE parameters of breast lesions were measured before CNB and compared according to histopathologic results (benign, high risk and DCIS) and lesion size (<20 mm and >20 mm). Clinico-radiologic and pathologic factors were compared between upgrade and non-upgrade groups after surgical excision or follow-up US. ResultsAfter surgical excision or follow-up US after more than one year, 29 lesions were upgraded for an overall upgrade rate of 12.9% (29/225). There were significant differences between upgrade and non-upgrade groups in age, mammographic category, US category, and sonographic features, including shape, margin, orientation, imaging-histologic correlation and E ratio. Patients with lesion upgrade were much older and had lesions characterized by significantly higher mammographic and US category (>4b), irregular shape, nonparallel orientation, microlobulated or angular margin, calcification in a mass, larger size on US (>20 mm) and greater imaging-histologic discordance. Multivariate analysis showed only mean and minimum elasticity values displayed a borderline association with histologic underestimation. ConclusionUpgrade of breast lesions diagnosed by US-guided CNB can be predicted using Emean and Emin among quantitative SWE parameters.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call