Breast cancer follow-up: Literature review and discussion

Abstract

This paper presents a review of the evidence for long-term breast cancer follow up to determine if routine clinical review post treatment for breast cancer has benefits for patients. There is little evidence that clinical review of patients beyond 3 years post-diagnosis leads to improved patient survival. Separate to survival there is a dearth of inquiry relating to the value of long-term clinical review of patient in terms of psychological outcomes, quality of life, patient satisfaction, access to specialist advice regarding management of symptoms, and reassurance. Regardless of supporting evidence, most breast units in the UK continue to undertake routine six monthly clinical reviews of patients up to a minimum of 5 years. A literature search for the period 1989 to January 2006 was undertaken using the CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO databases. Keywords such as 'cancer follow-up', 'cancer survivorship', and 'psychological outcomes of cancer' were utilised. Hand searching was also undertaken. Overall a paucity of evidence was found in relation to the long-term needs of breast cancer survivors. Alternatives to hospital-based follow-up are reported such as GP or nurse-led follow-up, but the fundamental question of the importance of follow-up in relation to psychological morbidity and quality of life still remains unanswered. Further research is needed to investigate the importance of follow-up to patient survivorship. Research to explore the concept of point of need access, as well as the qualitative experiences of patients post-discharge, informational needs at discharge and on-going psychosocial support is suggested. Ultimately this paper argues for a greater choice and involvement of patients in determining their future follow up needs, providing the patient with a personalised package of care based on risk assessment and subsequent education programmes to empower patients towards self-management following discharge.