Abstract
The artificial increase of breast cancer incidence is estimated as amounting to 30,000 new cases in the year 2000 in France. This increase would be attributable to a 1.2% lack of specificity for the whole range of diagnostic procedures. Sociologically, it appears that the Hippocratic devise "primum nil nocere" ("first don't harm") has been replaced today by "primum agere" ("act first"). Professionals should give information about both limitations and risks of screening. From an ethical point of view, screening programs justify themselves arguing that "there can't be harm in doing good". Absence of alternative strategies is not a sufficient argument for justifying screening with its uncertain consequences.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
