Abstract

Those of us who have been working at the interface between energy efficiency research and policy for a while share a double frustration. The first is that in spite of solid evidence that energy efficiency saves money, pollution and carbon, many sound policies and projects have long been collecting dust on the shelves of policy makers, energy suppliers, businesses and consumers. In other words, we still face the hugely important task of finding ways to get economically viable and technically feasible projects out into everyday practice. The second frustration derives from a timid reaction in the energy community to the increasing importance of environment and climate change. These lay down a gauntlet for deep changes in both energy policy and research agendas. We have been far too slow in adjusting our thoughts and actions to address these changes. For a long time, we have been held hostage by a peculiar form for economic thinking which, from the inside of its box, has viewed the resolution to the energy problem in optimising resources perceived as scarce in the short run but infinite in a long run. We should have moved out of this box earlier, but our imaginations have been captured by the promises of efficiency and optimisation. We have been slow to recognise that environmental carrying capacities are indifferent to efficiency but rather react to the volume of pollutants and emissions. For many categories of pollutants, especially CO2, these continue to increase in most parts of the world, or at least not decrease at rates necessary to avoid potential catastrophic changes. The onus is on Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries to reduce the use of conventional energy production. Substitution with renewable energy production will contribute to this, but as has so clearly been illustrated in the recent debates on biofuels, every form for energy production, renewable or not, has social and environmental consequences. The cleanest, cheapest and least intrusive way to free up more energy for basic needs is to reduce the consumption of energy for key ‘energy services’ such as heating and cooling, food chain refrigeration and (auto)mobility, to name a few. It is time to lift our heads out of the box which is built on assumptions about individual devices, atomEnergy Efficiency (2008) 1:105–106 DOI 10.1007/s12053-008-9014-x

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.