Abstract

Due to our ever-increasing reliance on criminal law to solve difficult social problems, Canadian courts have become the recipients of numerous additional statutory powers. These powers are only loosely related – and in that sense may be regarded as “ancillary” – to the core functions of a criminal justice system. This paper discusses two such developments: the power to make orders respecting offence-related property; and the power to appoint counsel on appeal. Because ancillary orders can have serious consequences for an individual, it is necessary when interpreting them to respect legislative intent while maintaining fidelity to essential principles of criminal justice. This paper offers one such framework for interpretation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.