Abstract

Indigenous peoples worldwide face barriers to participation in water governance, which includes planning and permitting of infrastructure that may affect water in their territories. In the United States, the extent to which Indigenous voices are heard—let alone incorporated into decision-making—depends heavily on whether or not Native nations are recognized by the federal government. In the southeastern United States, non-federally recognized Indigenous peoples continue to occupy their homelands along rivers, floodplains, and wetlands. These peoples, and the Tribal governments that represent them, rarely enter environmental decision-making spaces as sovereign nations and experts in their own right. Nevertheless, plans to construct the Atlantic Coast Pipeline prompted non-federally recognized Tribes to demand treatment as Tribal nations during permitting. Actions by the Tribes, which are recognized by the state of North Carolina, expose barriers to participation in environmental governance faced by Indigenous peoples throughout the United States, and particularly daunting challenges faced by state-recognized Tribes. After reviewing the legal and political landscapes that Native nations in the United States must navigate, we present a case study focused on Atlantic Coast Pipeline planning and permitting. We deliberately center Native voices and perspectives, often overlooked in non-Indigenous narratives, to emphasize Indigenous actions and illuminate participatory barriers. Although the Atlantic Coast Pipeline was cancelled in 2020, the case study reveals four enduring barriers to Tribal participation: adherence to minimum standards, power asymmetries, procedural narrowing, and “color-blind” planning. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for federal and state governments, developers, and Indigenous peoples to breach these barriers.

Highlights

  • Water governance is a collection of systems and processes involved in decision-making about the use, conservation, and protection of water [1,2]

  • After reviewing major policy and structural challenges to participation in environmental decision-making by Tribes in the United States (US), we present a case study from the southeastern state of North

  • Governance systems are nominally designed to protect the integrity of water and water-related places, the case study reveals difficulties faced by the Lumbee Tribe and other state-recognized Native nations expecting to participate in these systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water governance is a collection of systems and processes involved in decision-making about the use, conservation, and protection of water [1,2]. Regardless of whether or not governance systems are designed to accommodate their values and voices, Indigenous peoples must frequently enter these arenas to defend their treaty rights, exercise their sovereignty, preserve their cultures, or protect their interests in other ways To do so, they must often overcome barriers in governance, regardless of whether international borders are involved. Despite the importance of water to Indigenous peoples, and notwithstanding their pre-existing rights concerning water [10], substantial barriers exist to the meaningful participation of Indigenous peoples in all areas of environmental governance, including water governance These barriers are especially high for non-federally recognized Tribes within the US, who often lack the standing and resources to participate meaningfully, if at all. Governance systems are nominally designed to protect the integrity of water and water-related places, the case study reveals difficulties faced by the Lumbee Tribe and other state-recognized Native nations expecting to participate in these systems. Such actions could empower Native peoples to participate meaningfully—and collectively—in future decision-making processes, if not lead these processes outright

Borders and Barriers
Indigenous Peoples and US Water Governance
Indigenous Perspectives on Water and Water Governance
Indigenous Participation
Precarious Position of State-Recognized Tribes
Native Nations and Water in North Carolina
Native Peoples in North Carolina
Tribal present-day North
Physical and Political Geography of Water in North Carolina
Native Nations and Water Governance in North Carolina
Case Study
Planning and Permitting the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Timeline of Actions Concerning North Carolina Tribes
Indigenous Erasure
Breaching Barriers
Lessons from the ACP
Opportunities for the Future
Findings
178. Supplemental
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call