Abstract
Brand Authenticity is paramount in contemporary advertising and brands can communicate their authenticity by supporting social and environmental crises. Brands often donate money or products to causes, and while the value of such activities has been documented, the actual nature of the donation relative to authenticity and subsequent outcomes is unclear. How much should brands donate? What type of donation is best? What are the advantages of choosing certain crises over others? This paper explores how a brand’s authenticity might be affected by its response strategy to various crises. Two experimental studies provide converging evidence that with either an acute (a weather-related crisis) or a chronic social (school funding) issue, the right type and size of donation can lead to desirable brand outcomes while assisting those in need. We argue that symbolic consumption is the mechanism through which process occurs. We find that purchase intent can be generated through donating cash or products to a crisis that fits well with brand values, whereas digital engagement is best generated through product donation in support of a crisis which does not.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
