Brain–computer interfaces in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A metanalysis

Abstract

ObjectiveDespite recent groundbreaking findings on the genetic causes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and improvements on neuroimaging techniques for ALS diagnosis have been reported, the main clinical intervention in ALS remains palliative care. Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) have been proposed as a channel of communication and control for ALS patients. The present metanalysis was performed to test the evidence of BCI effectiveness in ALS, and to investigate whether the promising aims emerged from the first studies have been reached. MethodsStudies on ALS patients tested with BCIs, until June 2013, were searched in PubMed and PsychInfo. The random-effect approach was used to compute the pooled effectiveness of BCI in ALS. A meta-regression was performed to test whether there was a BCI performance improvement as a function of time. Finally, BCI effectiveness for complete paralyzed ALS patients was tested. Twenty-seven studies were eligible for metanalysis. ResultsThe pooled classification accuracy (C.A.) of ALS patients with BCI was about 70%, but this estimation was affected by significant heterogeneity and inconsistency. C.A. did not significantly increase as a function of time. C.A. of completely paralyzed ALS patients with BCI did not differ from that obtained by chance. ConclusionsAfter 15years of studies, it is as yet not possible to reliably establish the effectiveness of BCIs. SignificanceMethodological issues among the retrieved studies should be addressed and new well-powered studies should be conducted to confirm BCI effectiveness for ALS patients.