Abstract

N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements improve the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) in randomized-controlled trials and meta-analyses, with the higher efficacy from anti-inflammatory eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) than brain-dominant docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). To investigate the specific brain mechanisms of the anti-inflammatory anti-depressant nutraceutical compounds, we recruited 24 MDD subjects in this double-blind, head-to-head study with a 12-week EPA or DHA treatment (clinical trial registration number: NCT03871088). The depression severity was assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D). Brain responses to emotional stimuli were measured by a 3-Tesla MRI. The correlation between HAM-D scores and brain responses also were tested. Compared to 18 healthy controls, the brain responses of untreated 24 MDD patients mainly revealed hypoactivity in the regions associated with emotion perception and emotion control when processing positive emotion. After treatment, more remitted MDD patients have been observed in the EPA as compared to the DHA groups. In addition, the EPA, but not DHA, treatment revealed increased activity in the regions associated with emotion perception and cognitive control when processing positive emotion. The correlation analysis further revealed negative correlation between HAM-D scores and brain responses in cognitive control regions. The results of this study may imply the compensatory brain responses of cognitive and emotion controls by EPA but not DHA and underpin personalized medicine with anti-inflammatory nutraceuticals toward depression treatments.

Highlights

  • Depression is an increasing mental health problem around whole world

  • There is no significant difference in age, sex, and education years among eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and healthy control groups

  • The main finding is that EPA differentiates DHA treatment by revealing the increased activity in the regions associated with emotion perception and cognitive control when processing the positive emotion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Depression is an increasing mental health problem around whole world. It has been estimated that 6.7% adults in U.S had at least one major depressive episode in 2014 [1]. Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have negative affective bias in terms of decreased responsiveness to positive emotion stimuli and/or increased responsiveness to negative emotion stimuli [2,3]. The MDD patients exhibit selective attention bias and affective facial perception bias [5,6]. Recent study further reported that the biased affective facial recognition may reflected the clinical state, but not trait, of MDD [7]. The affective stimuli may be a useful tool to probe the static changes of the MDD

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call