Abstract

Prosodic information is crucial for spoken language comprehension and especially for syntactic parsing, because prosodic cues guide the hearer's syntactic analysis. The time course and mechanisms of this interplay of prosody and syntax are not yet well-understood. In particular, there is an ongoing debate whether local prosodic cues are taken into account automatically or whether they are processed in relation to the global prosodic context in which they appear. The present study explores whether the perception of a prosodic boundary is affected by its position within an utterance. In an event-related potential (ERP) study we tested if the brain response evoked by the prosodic boundary differs when the boundary occurs early in a list of three names connected by conjunctions (i.e., after the first name) as compared to later in the utterance (i.e., after the second name). A closure positive shift (CPS)—marking the processing of a prosodic phrase boundary—was elicited for stimuli with a late boundary, but not for stimuli with an early boundary. This result is further evidence for an immediate integration of prosodic information into the parsing of an utterance. In addition, it shows that the processing of prosodic boundary cues depends on the previously processed information from the preceding prosodic context.

Highlights

  • Listeners’ comprehension of spoken language is guided by prosodic information provided in the uttered speech stream

  • In an event-related potential (ERP) study we tested if the brain response evoked by the prosodic boundary differs when the boundary occurs early in a list of three names connected by conjunctions as compared to later in the utterance

  • The boundaries of major prosodic phrases, so-called intonation phrases (Beckman and Pierrehumbert, 1986), are mainly signaled by three prosodic cues: a pitch change, final lengthening and a pause between two phrases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Listeners’ comprehension of spoken language is guided by prosodic information provided in the uttered speech stream. Prosodic characteristics such as the distribution of pauses or changes in the fundamental frequency have an important structuring function and help the listener to understand the speaker’s intention. Intonation phrase boundaries (IPBs) typically fall together with syntactic boundaries (Downing, 1970; Selkirk, 2005; for German: Truckenbrodt, 2005) For this reason, the perception of an IPB can be an important guide to the syntactic structure of spoken language; it is of special interest in psycholinguistic research in the attempt to bring to light how prosodic information is processed and how it contributes to sentence comprehension

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call