Abstract

Expert soccer players are able to utilize their opponents' early body kinematics to predict the direction in which the opponent will move. We have previously demonstrated enhanced fMRI activation in experts in the motor components of an action observation network (AON) during sports anticipation tasks. Soccer players often need to prevent opponents from successfully predicting their line of attack, and consequently may try to deceive them; for example, by performing a step-over. We examined how AON activations and expertise effects are modified by the presence of deception. Three groups of participants; higher-skilled males, lower-skilled males, and lower-skilled females, viewed video clips in point-light format, from a defender's perspective, of a player approaching and turning with the ball. The observer's task in the scanner was to determine whether the move was normal or deceptive (involving a step-over), while whole-brain functional images were acquired. In a second counterbalanced block with identical stimuli the task was to predict the direction of the ball. Activations of AON for identification of deception overlapped with activations from the direction identification task. Higher-skilled players showed significantly greater activation than lower-skilled players in a subset of AON areas; and lower-skilled males in turn showed greater activation than lower-skilled females, but females showed more activation in visual cortex. Activation was greater for deception identification than for direction identification in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex, anterior insula, cingulate gyrus, and premotor cortex. Conversely, greater activation for direction than deception identification was found in anterior cingulate cortex and caudate nucleus. Results are consistent with the view that explicit identification of deceptive moves entails cognitive effort and also activates limbic structures associated with social cognition and affective responses.

Highlights

  • Expert players in interceptive sports such as soccer react under great time pressure and need to predict the actions of their opponents and the direction of play (Reilly et al, 2000; Abernethy et al, 2001; Savelsbergh et al, 2005; Williams et al, 2011)

  • The percentage of correct responses was measured for both direction identification and deception identification in the scanner, and a mixed ANOVA was conducted with identification task, trial type, and occlusion (0, −160 ms) as within-participant variables and group as a between-participant variable

  • RESPONSES TO SOCCER ACTION IDENTIFICATION The general pattern of activations found in the action identification tasks in the present study is consistent with previous research on action identification in general (Decety and Grèzes, 1999; Rizzolatti and Craighero, 2004; Filimon et al, 2007) and in fMRI sport anticipation studies in particular (Wright and Jackson, 2007; Wright et al, 2010, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Expert players in interceptive sports such as soccer react under great time pressure and need to predict the actions of their opponents and the direction of play (Reilly et al, 2000; Abernethy et al, 2001; Savelsbergh et al, 2005; Williams et al, 2011). The reductive approach to identifying the minimum visual information sufficient to support expert anticipation has been taken further with the use of point-light video stimuli. Comparisons of performance based on ball trajectory alone and studies using point-light stimuli indicate the pre-eminence of body kinematics as a cue to future action (Abernethy et al, 2001, 2008; Huys et al, 2008)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call