Abstract

Unlike the assumption of modern linguistics, there is non-arbitrary association between sound and meaning in sound symbolic words. Neuroimaging studies have suggested the unique contribution of the superior temporal sulcus to the processing of sound symbolism. However, because these findings are limited to the mapping between sound symbolism and visually presented objects, the processing of sound symbolic information may also involve the sensory-modality dependent mechanisms. Here, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment to test whether the brain regions engaged in the tactile processing of object properties are also involved in mapping sound symbolic information with tactually perceived object properties. Thirty-two healthy subjects conducted a matching task in which they judged the congruency between softness perceived by touch and softness associated with sound symbolic words. Congruency effect was observed in the orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, medial superior frontal gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and cerebellum. This effect in the insula and medial superior frontal gyri was overlapped with softness-related activity that was separately measured in the same subjects in the tactile experiment. These results indicate that the insula and medial superior frontal gyrus play a role in processing sound symbolic information and relating it to the tactile softness information.

Highlights

  • Unlike the assumption of modern linguistics, there is non-arbitrary association between sound and meaning in sound symbolic words

  • We examined the brain networks engaged in the processing of sound symbolic information that are associated with object’s softness and hardness

  • While a distributed set of brain regions was affected by the congruency between perceived softness and sound symbolic words, the congruency effect was observed in or close to the region that showed the graded response to perceived softness in the anterior insula and medial superior frontal gyrus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Unlike the assumption of modern linguistics, there is non-arbitrary association between sound and meaning in sound symbolic words. If the sound symbolic words are associated with object shape and size, the processing of these words can involve the neural substrates that associate the sound with the sensory processing of object shape and size This idea is supported by findings which showed that congenitally blind individuals show weaker soundshape ­associations[9,10,11] and a study that found that prelingual auditory deprivation reduced the bouba–kiki effect, they performed above chance ­level[12]. Another study showed that the imagery of unpleasantness from pain-related mimetic words evoked activation of several brain regions including the anterior cingulate cortex, a part of the network of pain p­ rocessing[14] These findings partially support the hypothesis that the processing of sound symbolic words can involve sensory-dependent and sensory-independent networks in the brain

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call