Abstract

Assessment of neurologic injury and the evolution of severe neurologic injury is limited in comatose or critically ill patients that lack a reliable neurologic examination. For common yet severe pathologies such as the comatose state after cardiac arrest, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), critical medical decisions are made on the basis of the neurologic injury. Decisions regarding active intensive care management, need for neurosurgical intervention, and withdrawal of care, depend on a reliable, high-quality assessment of the true state of neurologic injury, and have traditionally relied on limited assessments such as intracranial pressure monitoring and electroencephalogram. However, even within TBI there exists a spectrum of disease that is likely not captured by such limited monitoring and thus a more directed effort towards obtaining a more robust biophysical signature of the individual patient must be undertaken. In this review, multimodal monitoring including the most promising serum markers of neuronal injury, cerebral microdialysis, brain tissue oxygenation, and pressure reactivity index to access brain microenvironment will be discussed with their utility among specific pathologies that may help determine a more complete picture of the neurologic injury state for active intensive care management and long-term outcomes. Goal-directed therapy guided by a multi-modality approach appears to be superior to standard intracranial pressure (ICP) guided therapy and should be explored further across multiple pathologies. Future directions including the application of optogenetics to evaluate brain injury and recovery and even as an adjunct monitoring modality will also be discussed.

Highlights

  • Brain monitoring is important in critical clinical scenarios where the extent or evolution of neurologic injury is unknown

  • We focus on techniques such as serum markers of neuronal injury, intracranial pressure monitoring, microdialysis, pressure reactivity index, and brain tissue oxygenation that are currently available at the bedside for clinical decision making

  • Multimodality monitoring is more accurate than Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring alone to predict cerebral hypoperfusion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain monitoring is important in critical clinical scenarios where the extent or evolution of neurologic injury is unknown. Common situations include the comatose state after cardiac arrest, poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) et al. The extent of neurologic injury and injury progression are crucial in determining prognosis and guiding intensive care strategies to ameliorate the neurologic injury [1,2]. By examining several clinical diagnoses, a glimpse of the scale of critically ill patients in whom brain monitoring is of importance can be seen. Around 235,000 patients are hospitalized in the United States with traumatic brain injury with a significant portion having severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8) [3]. In the comatose or sedated patient, even the most attentive clinicians can often be in the dark about evolving secondary neurologic injury

Objective of Brain Monitoring
Serum Markers of Glial or Neuronal Injury
Cerebral Blood Flow Monitoring
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
Cerebral Microdialysis—Assessment of Brain Microenvironment
Pressure Reactivity Index
PbtO2 Monitoring
Timing of Brain Monitoring
Findings
10. Optogenetics—Possible Future Monitoring Tool?
11. Use of Multimodality Monitoring
12. Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.