Abstract

Subjects’ interaction is the core of most human activities. This is the reason why a lack of coordination is often the cause of missing goals, more than individual failure. While there are different subjective and objective measures to assess the level of mental effort required by subjects while facing a situation that is getting harder, that is, mental workload, to define an objective measure based on how and if team members are interacting is not so straightforward. In this study, behavioral, subjective and synchronized electroencephalographic data were collected from couples involved in a cooperative task to describe the relationship between task difficulty and team coordination, in the sense of interaction aimed at cooperatively performing the assignment. Multiple-brain connectivity analysis provided information about the whole interacting system. The results showed that averaged local properties of a brain network were affected by task difficulty. In particular, strength changed significantly with task difficulty and clustering coefficients strongly correlated with the workload itself. In particular, a higher workload corresponded to lower clustering values over the central and parietal brain areas. Such results has been interpreted as less efficient organization of the network when the subjects’ activities, due to high workload tendencies, were less coordinated.

Highlights

  • Most human activities are based on the interaction between two or more subjects, the success of a task is based on high individual performance, and on the ability to do effective teamwork

  • The comparison between workload perceived by the Pilot and Co-Pilot groups on the same condition was not significantly different both in Easy (p = 0.625) and in Hard (p = 0.438) according to the Wilcoxon test

  • Discussion study, cooperationbetween between humans humans performing performing operational under different In In thisthis study, thethe cooperation operationaltasks tasks under different difficulty levels has been investigated by means of subjective, behavioral and physiological measures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most human activities are based on the interaction between two or more subjects, the success of a task is based on high individual performance, and on the ability to do effective teamwork. In this regard, during the last decade one of the aims of social neuroscience has been to define objective measures, mainly based on neurophysiological signals, of successful social and cooperative interaction [1,2]. Dodel et al [5] measured team performance and coordination during a room cleaning task (four subjects searching and identifying threats along predefined path into a room) by using position and velocity information for three different skill levels (Novice, Intermediate and Expert)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.