Abstract

ObjectivesTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates brain activity and heart function. The induced parasympathetic predominance leads to an increase of heart rate variability (HRV). Knowledge on the corresponding cortical activation pattern is, however, scarce. We hypothesized taVNS-induced HRV increases to be related to modulation of cortical activity that regulates the autonomic outflow to the heart.Materials and MethodsIn thirteen healthy subjects, we simultaneously recorded 64-channel electroencephalography and electrocardiography during taVNS. Two taVNS stimulation targets were investigated, i.e., the cymba conchae and inner tragus, and compared to active control stimulation in the anatomical vicinity, i.e., at the crus helicis and outer tragus. We used intermitted stimulation bursts of 25 Hz applied at a periodicity of 1 Hz. HRV was estimated with different time-domain methodologies: standard deviation of RR (SDNN), the root mean squares of successive differences (RMSSD), the percentage of RR-intervals with at least 50 ms deviation from the preceding RR-interval (pNN50), and the difference of consecutive RR intervals weighted by their mean (rrHRV).ResultsThe stimulation-induced HRV increases corresponded to frequency-specific oscillatory modulation of different cortical areas. All stimulation targets induced power modulations that were proportional to the HRV elevation. The most prominent changes that corresponded to HRV increases across all parameters and stimulation locations were frontal elevations in the theta-band. In the delta-band, there were frontal increases (RMSSD, pNN50, rrHRV, SDNN) and decreases (SDNN) across stimulation sites. In higher frequencies, there was a more divers activity pattern: Outer tragus/crus helicis stimulation increased oscillatory activity with the most prominent changes for the SDNN in frontal (alpha-band, beta-band) and fronto-parietal (gamma-band) areas. During inner tragus/cymba conchae stimulation the predominant pattern was a distributed power decrease, particularly in the fronto-parietal gamma-band.ConclusionNeuro–cardiac interactions can be modulated by electrical stimulation at different auricular locations. Increased HRV during stimulation is correlated with frequency-specific increases and decreases of oscillatory activity in different brain areas. When applying specific HRV measures, cortical patterns related to parasympathetic (RMSSD, pNN50, rrHRV) and sympathetic (SDNN) modulation can be identified. Thus, cortical oscillations may be used to define stimulation locations and parameters for research and therapeutic purposes.

Highlights

  • The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a key role in many neurological, psychiatric, cardiovascular, immunological, and metabolic disorders (Kaniusas et al, 2019)

  • All stimulation targets induced power modulations that were proportional to the heart rate variability (HRV) elevation (Figure 3 and Supplementary Tables 1, 2)

  • The most prominent changes that corresponded to HRV increases across all measures (RMSSD, pNN50, rrHRV, and SDNN) and stimulation locations were significant frontal elevations in the oscillatory theta-band

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a key role in many neurological, psychiatric, cardiovascular, immunological, and metabolic disorders (Kaniusas et al, 2019). Stimulation of the vagal nerve, which represents an essential feedback-loop between brain and body via its afferent fibers (80%) and efferent (20%), modulates the ANS toward parasympathetic predominance (Kaniusas et al, 2019). Switching points of these loops are brainstem nuclei such as the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS, afferent), nucleus spinalis of the trigeminal nerve (NSNT, afferent), nucleus ambiguous (NA, efferent), and dorsal motor nucleus (DMN, efferent). During taVNS a shift in autonomic function toward parasympathetic predominance has been revealed by increases of heart rate variability (HRV; Clancy et al, 2014; De Couck et al, 2017; Sclocco et al, 2019); there are still open questions with regard to the auricular stimulation targets (Badran et al, 2018a; Burger and Verkuil, 2018), the impact on cortical brain areas and the underlying mechanisms (Leutzow et al, 2013, 2014; Polak et al, 2014) that influence the heart– brain-interaction (Silvani et al, 2016; Keute et al, 2021)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.