Abstract

It has been well-documented that the brain changes in states of chronic pain. Less is known about changes in the brain that predict the transition from acute to chronic pain. Evidence from neuroimaging studies suggests a shift from brain regions involved in nociceptive processing to corticostriatal brain regions that are instrumental in the processing of reward and emotional learning in the transition to the chronic state. In addition, dysfunction in descending pain modulatory circuits encompassing the periaqueductal gray and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex may also be a key risk factor for pain chronicity. Although longitudinal imaging studies have revealed potential predictors of pain chronicity, their causal role has not yet been determined. Here we review evidence from studies that involve non-invasive brain stimulation to elucidate to what extent they may help to elucidate the brain circuits involved in pain chronicity. Especially, we focus on studies using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques [e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), particularly its repetitive form (rTMS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)] in the context of musculoskeletal pain chronicity. We focus on the role of the motor cortex because of its known contribution to sensory components of pain via thalamic inhibition, and the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex because of its role on cognitive and affective processing of pain. We will also discuss findings from studies using experimentally induced prolonged pain and studies implicating the DLPFC, which may shed light on the earliest transition phase to chronicity. We propose that combined brain stimulation and imaging studies might further advance mechanistic models of the chronicity process and involved brain circuits. Implications and challenges for translating the research on mechanistic models of the development of chronic pain to clinical practice will also be addressed.

Highlights

  • Chronic musculoskeletal pain is defined as a persisting or reoccurring pain that originates in musculoskeletal structure [1]

  • The authors showed that pain decreased significantly after active rTMS compared to sham, and pain reduction significantly correlated with previously reported regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)

  • In contrast to what is known in chronic pain conditions, where the extent of M1 reorganization was associated with pain severity [75], this study showed that M1 reorganization was not associated with the development of pain severity and disability

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is defined as a persisting or reoccurring pain that originates in musculoskeletal structure [1]. Evidence from longitudinal imaging studies suggests a shift from brain regions involved in nociceptive processes toward brain areas supporting emotion, motivation, and memory processes when acute musculoskeletal pain persists [5, 18]. Such findings are an important step toward unraveling neural changes associated with chronic pain. Neuroimaging studies allowed to further advance our knowledge about plastic changes related to pain chronicity, they cannot provide causal relationships between them In this context, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods have been used to modulate cortical excitability in specific brain areas, in order to show a direct relationship between brain and behavior. Stimulation (tDCS), which can be used to manipulate the membrane potential of neurons and modulate spontaneous firing rates, but which by itself is not sufficient to discharge resting neurons or axons [34]

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Transcranial Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation
NIBS Studies on the Transition to Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
Brain Targets in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Patients
Medial Prefrontal Cortex as an Additional NIBS Target
NIBS Mechanistic Interference Framework
Combining NIBS With Imaging and Electrophysiological Methods
Findings
CONCLUDING REMARKS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call