Abstract
In approaching sonata form, Brahms and Schenker both struck a compromise between a quintessential late-nineteenth-century view of musical form in which continuous linear evolution is valued above elements of sectionalization, and their sensitivity to the realities of a formal type based in part on the dramatic delineation of a parallel thematic design. This essay explores the difficulties Schenker encountered in the derivation of sonata form from a single Ursatz and reveals that he was anachronistically forcing the ideal of organic unity onto the large-scale formal conventions of the classical period. However, these very difficulties evaporate when his method of analysis is applied to a number of Brahms's more unusual sonata forms. Through an overlap of the retransition and the beginning of the recapitulation and a reinterpretation of the sonata principle, Brahms achieved creatively the specific type of organic unity Schenker had difficulty demonstrating in his analyses of late-eighteenth-century music. This content downloaded from 157.55.39.212 on Thu, 09 Jun 2016 06:32:59 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.