Abstract

A comprehensive analysis of the IsoRay Medical model CS‐1 Rev2 brachytherapy source was performed. Dose distributions were simulated using Monte Carlo methods (MCNP5) in liquid water, Solid Water™, and Virtual Water™ spherical phantoms. From these results, the in‐water brachytherapy dosimetry parameters have been determined, and were compared with those of Murphy et al. [Med. Phys. 31, 1529–1538 (2004)] using measurements and simulations. Our results suggest that calculations obtained using erroneous cross‐section libraries should be discarded as recommended by the 2004 AAPM TG‐43U1 report. Our value of is within 1.3% of that measured by Chen et al. [Med. Phys. 32, 3279–3285 (2005)] using TLDs and the calculated results of Wittman and Fisher [Med. Phys., 49–54 (2007)] using MCNP5. Using the discretized energy approach of Rivard [Appl. Radiat. Isot. 55, 775–782 (2001)] to ascertain the impact of individual photons on radial dose function and anisotropy functions, there was virtual equivalence of results for and for a mono‐energetic photon source. Comparisons of radial dose function and 2D anisotropy function data are also included, and an analysis of material composition and cross‐section libraries was performed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.