Brachio-basilic upper arm transposition fistulas vs. prosthetic brachio-axillary vascular access grafts-Which one is preferred for hemodialysis?

Abstract

There is still controversy on the use of brachio-basilic upper arm transposition fistula (BBAVF) and prosthetic brachio-axillary vascular access grafts (BAPTFE) in patients with no suitable cephalic veins for creating an autogenous brachio-cephalic fistula. In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 60 hemodialysis patients who were not a suitable candidate for BCAVF were randomly assigned into two groups: BBAVF and BAPTFE. The patients were clinically followed up to 1 year and the patency rate and access-related complications were compared between the two groups. Access failure rate in the BBAVF and BAPTFE groups was 30.0% and 36.6%, respectively. The primary patency time was 232.73 ± 113.36 and 261.53 ± 147.37 days, respectively (P = 0.40). Thrombosis formation and infection were the two main causes for access failure, yet indicating no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). BBAVF and BAPTFE have comparable clinical outcomes in short-term follow-up. Therefore, BAPTFE can be used as an alternative vascular access for hemodialysis in patients who are not a suitable candidate for BBAVF.