Abstract

Leaching of nitrate from fertilisers diminishes nitrogen use efficiency (the portion of nitrogen used by a plant) and is a major source of agricultural pollution. To improve nitrogen capture, grasses such as brachiaria are increasingly used, especially in South America and Africa, as a cover crop, either via intercropping or in rotation. However, the complex interactions between soil structure, nitrogen and the root systems of maize and different species of forage grasses remain poorly understood. This study explored how soil structure modification by the roots of maize (Zea maize), palisade grass (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) and ruzigrass (Brachiaria ruziziensis) affected nitrate leaching and retention, measured via chemical breakthrough curves. All plants were found to increase the rate of nitrate transport suggesting root systems increase the tendency for preferential flow. The greater density of fine roots produced by palisade grass, subtly decreased nitrate leaching potential through increased complexity of the soil pore network assessed with X-ray Computed Tomography. A dominance of larger roots in ruzigrass and maize increased nitrate loss through enhanced solute flow bypassing the soil matrix. These results suggest palisade grass could be a more efficient nitrate catch crop than ruzigrass (the most extensively used currently in countries such as Brazil) due to retardation in solute flow associated with the fine root system and the complex pore network.

Highlights

  • Leaching of nitrate from fertilisers diminishes nitrogen use efficiency and is a major source of agricultural pollution

  • Scope exists to adopt agronomic practices that enhance nitrate capture and decrease losses, either by selecting crop root systems capable of capturing deep[20] or diffuse[18] nitrate pools, or that can alter hydrological properties through changes to soil physical structure[21]. This is reflected in large-scale land management changes of the fragile soils of the Brazilian Cerrado, an agricultural area at risk from nitrate leaching due to intensive agricultural practises[22]

  • Whilst the differences in the root system architecture between the planted treatments are clear, they are less pronounced in the breakthrough curves, especially between the brachiaria treatments which can be most likely attributable to the high variability that is often observed during soil hydraulic measurements[46]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Leaching of nitrate from fertilisers diminishes nitrogen use efficiency (the portion of nitrogen used by a plant) and is a major source of agricultural pollution. A dominance of larger roots in ruzigrass and maize increased nitrate loss through enhanced solute flow bypassing the soil matrix These results suggest palisade grass could be a more efficient nitrate catch crop than ruzigrass (the most extensively used currently in countries such as Brazil) due to retardation in solute flow associated with the fine root system and the complex pore network. Scope exists to adopt agronomic practices that enhance nitrate capture and decrease losses, either by selecting crop root systems capable of capturing deep[20] or diffuse[18] nitrate pools, or that can alter hydrological properties through changes to soil physical structure[21] This is reflected in large-scale land management changes of the fragile soils of the Brazilian Cerrado, an agricultural area at risk from nitrate leaching due to intensive agricultural practises[22]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call