Abstract
Brachiaria decumbens is becoming one the most common weeds growing in young coffee orchards because, besides its fast growth and difficulty of control, new coffee orchards are usually established in pasture areas. In order to verify the effect of B. decumbens plant density on the early growth of coffee (Coffea arabica L. cv. Catuaí Amarelo), a competition experiment was conducted under semi-controlled humidity conditions. Soil collected in a Typic Haplustox was placed in 70 L asbestos cement boxes and one coffee seedling was planted in each box. The B. decumbens seedlings were transplanted to the boxes at the 2-4 leaf stage. Treatments consisted of 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 48, and 60 weeds m-2. The experimental period started 120 days after transplanting and the experimental design was organized as completely randomized blocks, with four replicates. All coffee plant parameters evaluated were negatively affected by the interference. The most sensitive characteristics were leaf area (41.8% reduction with 8 plants m-2, reaching 68.7% at a density of 60 plants m-2). Therefore, at a density of 8 plants m-2 the reduction in leaf dry biomass was 41.4% compared with the check. At the density of 60 plants m-2 it was 72.8%. B. decumbens, at a density of 8 or more plants m-2, suppressed coffee plants during a growth period of 120 days.
Highlights
Many factors can interfere with the growth development and production of the coffee plant (Friessleben et al, 1991)
Considering that the world coffee production is in the order of 120 million annual burlap bags (FNP Consultoria e Comércio, 2003), it is estimated that the losses related to weed interference can reach 18 million annual bags
Among Poaceae weeds, Brachiaria decumbens Stapf. is becoming one the most common weeds growing in young coffee orchards because of its fast growth and difficulty of control in new coffee orchards that are established in pasture areas
Summary
Many factors can interfere with the growth development and production of the coffee plant (Friessleben et al, 1991). These factors can be physical (water supply, nutrients, soil pH, etc.) or biological, that is, those that result from the interaction with live organisms (Pitelli & Marchi, 1991). Prominent among these biological factors is the interference of weeds on crops due to competition for light, nutrients, and water (Blanco, 1972). Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.), v.61, n.6, p.579-583, Nov./Dec. 2004
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.