Abstract

The Bayes point machine (BPM) has been demonstrated theoretically to have better learning ability than the support vector machine (SVM). We describe these two machines and tell how they differ. We empirically compare the performance of the BPM and the SVM on an image dataset. We conclude that the SVM is more attractive for the image classification task because it requires a much shorter training time, despite the fact that the BPM achieves slightly higher classification accuracy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.