Abstract
ABSTRACT This article focuses on Bourdieu’s topological conception of social space to expand on it and develop an alternative model. Bourdieu describes social space as topological because it consists of a set of relative positions. Individuals in similar positions can come together to form social groups, so that differences between groups reveal or at least reflect the different positions in space. For this reason, it is convenient to think of social space as Bourdieu understands it as a space of groups. Yet there are other kinds of geometry beside topology. The article examines the difference between topology and Euclidean geometry to determine how we can modify Bourdieu’s model to uncover other potential features of social space. Rather than conceptualizing social space as a space of groups, we can envision a flow that is created as individuals relay one another so that the flow can go on even though the same individuals never stay put. Flows can arise by finding support on other flows. Thus arise structures in space that cannot be ‘mapped onto’ social actors occupying different positions because actors only sustain the flows through their perpetual turnover.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.