Abstract

An onus rests with members of supplier firms to successfully navigate inter-firm boundaries so as to achieve customer outcomes while also satisfying supervisor requirements. This need is particularly acute during the often lengthy, complex and intense processes that characterize business solutions implementation. Currently, limited research exists as to how boundary spanners reconcile between these tensions to achieve customer outcomes. It is, therefore, the focus of the present study. Drawing on interviews with 45 respondents, the study finds that boundary spanners adopt ‘customer service styles’ — Consistent behaviors to address customer requirements while reconciling between multiple tensions. These styles are labeled ‘dynamic engagement’, ‘dynamic avoidance’, ‘anticipatory engagement’ and ‘anticipatory avoidance’. The study also explores the nature of the underlying mental models that boundary spanners use. The study also considers the effects of these customer service styles on customer-perceived value, with not all customer service styles having equal effects.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.