Abstract

Abstract A two-point boundary value problem is considered on the interval [ 0 , 1 ] $[0,1]$ , where the leading term in the differential operator is a Caputo fractional derivative of order δ with 1 < δ < 2 $1<\delta <2$ . Writing u for the solution of the problem, it is known that typically u ' ' ( x ) $u^{\prime \prime }(x)$ blows up as x → 0 $x\rightarrow 0$ . A numerical example demonstrates the possibility of a further phenomenon that imposes difficulties on numerical methods: u may exhibit a boundary layer at x = 1 when δ is near 1. The conditions on the data of the problem under which this layer appears are investigated by first solving the constant-coefficient case using Laplace transforms, determining precisely when a layer is present in this special case, then using this information to enlighten our examination of the general variable-coefficient case (in particular, in the construction of a barrier function for u). This analysis proves that usually no boundary layer can occur in the solution u at x = 0, and that the quantity M = max x ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] b ( x ) $M = \max _{x\in [0,1]}b(x)$ , where b is the coefficient of the first-order term in the differential operator, is critical: when M < 1 $M<1$ , no boundary layer is present when δ is near 1, but when M ≥ 1 then a boundary layer at x = 1 is possible. Numerical results illustrate the sharpness of most of our results.

Highlights

  • Boundary value problems whose di erential operators involve fractional derivatives are of great interest, as these non-classical derivatives can model some physical processes where integer-order derivatives are unsuitable; see [6, 8] for an extensive list of recent applications and mathematical developments in this area

  • We considered a two-point boundary value problem whose leading term is a Caputo fractional derivative of order with 1 < < 2

  • By considering rst the special case of a constant-coe cient operator, for which the solution can be determined explicitly, we showed that when is near 1, the solution of the boundary value problem may exhibit a boundary layer at the endpoint = 1 of the domain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Boundary value problems whose di erential operators involve fractional derivatives are of great interest, as these non-classical derivatives can model some physical processes where integer-order derivatives are unsuitable; see [6, 8] for an extensive list of recent applications and mathematical developments in this area. This is the case for the fractional-derivative problem (1.2): see [5, 6, 15], where computed solutions of (1.2) become less accurate when is near 1 This loss of accuracy appears in only some numerical examples in these papers, and no explanation is given there, but it is con ned to problems whose solutions exhibit a boundary layer at = 1. From this formula we deduce that, when is near 1, a boundary layer in at = 1 can appear only if ≥ 1, while never has a boundary layer at = 0 even though max[0,1]| ( )| blows up as → 1+ if ≥ 1.

Now the convolution theorem for Laplace transforms yields
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.