Abstract

There are a number of different ways to approach the formulation of boundary integral equations for plate bending. While in some sense these are equivalent (if correctly done) the differences becomes quite significant when the resulting formulations are implemented in the numerical solution of specific boundary value problems. Most early proposals for the direct numerical solution of plate bending boundary integral equations were based on so-called indirect formulations and generally were designed for specific classes of problems. One of the earliest significant examples is due to Jaswon and Maiti1 who propose a formulation for uniformly loaded clamped and simply supported plates based on the introduction of two source distribution densities on the plate boundary generating harmonic potentials which are then related to the plate displacement. A somewhat different formulation of the same type to treat uniformly loaded simply supported polygonal plates was proposed by Maiti and Chakrabarty2. Hansen3 derived two different boundary integral formulations designed mainly for plates containing holes with free edges.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.