Abstract
Two methods of detecting quasiperiodic signals—the well-known method of calculating correlation coefficients and the method of a morphological analysis that makes it possible to detect signals with variable phases, which is important in isolating signals at long distances from their sources—are compared. The efficiency of a morphological analysis is in solving the problems of isolating quasiperiodic signals against the background of noise that is comparable to or exceeds (in amplitude) the signal under study. These two methods are compared using subwoofer signals recorded in August 2009 at the Scientific Station of the A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics. The signal frequencies were chosen within a range of 45–130 Hz and the distance to the source was from 0 to 1255 m. Signals were recorded during night and morning hours, which made it possible to study the potentialities of these methods in isolating a desired signal under both disturbed and undisturbed states of the atmosphere (in the absence or presence of noise of different origins).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.