Abstract

Although the concept of low malignant potential and/or borderline malignancy of some epithelial ovarian tumors was endorsed by the World Health Organization in 1973, uncertainty exists regarding the biologic behavior aspects of these lesions and this may account for the discrepancy in the 5-year survival figures reported for patients afflicted with these malignancies (76-95 per cent). We have reviewed the clinicopathologic aspects of 26 cases of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors and searched the literature. Based on our analysis, we have concluded that: 1) rupture of the cyst at surgery did not affect the patient's outcome but positive peritoneal fluid cytology did. 2) The term borderline should be replaced by ovarian intraepithelial neoplasia or preinvasive carcinoma and should solely be used in patients with stage I disease. 3) There is no justification for adjuvant therapy in adequately staged and surgically treated stage Ia and Ib disease. 4) Patients with stage II or more disease and those with positive peritoneal fluid cytology should be treated as aggressively as all other invasive, well-differentiated, epithelial ovarian tumors. 5) Our observation in cases of epithelial ovarian tumor cells grown on an extracellular matrix tends to indicate that parameters other than morphology may aid in assessing the invasive potential of these malignancies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.