Abstract
Microeconomic data often have within-cluster dependence. This dependence affects standard error estimation and inference in regression models, including the instrumental variables model. Standard corrections assume that the number of clusters is large, but when this is not the case, Wald and weak-instrument-robust tests can be severely over-sized. We examine the use of bootstrap methods to construct appropriate critical values for these tests when the number of clusters is small. We find that variants of the wild bootstrap perform well and reduce absolute size bias significantly, independent of instrument strength or cluster size. We also provide guidance in the choice among possible weak-instrument-robust tests when data have cluster dependence. These results are applicable to fixed-effects panel data models.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
