Abstract

Researchers conducting fieldwork at sites of resource extraction experience unique challenges associated with methodology, such as subjectivity and positionality. These challenges are further amplified through the boom and bust nature of extraction. However, these rapidly changing physical and political landscapes also give way to unique opportunities to engage with communities undergoing socioeconomic change. Commentary from researchers working in communities impacted by the development of hydraulic fracturing activity and associated infrastructure highlights the tensions and perspectives that emerge from institutional permanency, knowledge of the subterranean, oral histories, and family ties. Although these cases focus on fieldwork conducted in the American west, it is our hope that this commentary may further the discussion of issues related to boom and bust methodology to sites of resource extraction beyond North America.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call